![]() | ![]() Products ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Technical Support » DBISAM Technical Support » Support Forums » DBISAM Client/Server » View Thread |
Messages 1 to 5 of 5 total |
![]() |
Tue, Feb 26 2008 10:30 PM | Permanent Link |
Oliver Bock | I recently had our first client running my server program as an NT
service on Vista. In this configuration Engine.GetServerConfig() reports that the maximum number of connections is 5! (Normally it reports 65535.) Apart from limiting the connections, everything appears to run normally. This does not occur when the same server program as a GUI application, nor does it occur when it runs as a service on Windows 2000 or Windows XP. I now adjust max_connections to a larger number and call SetServerConfig() and everything works fine. |
Wed, Feb 27 2008 6:09 AM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Oliver,
<< I recently had our first client running my server program as an NT service on Vista. In this configuration Engine.GetServerConfig() reports that the maximum number of connections is 5! >> Are you sure that you weren't accidentally using a STD version server (or one that was compiled with the STD version) ? I'll check it out and make sure that it is working okay for the next DBISAM build. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Wed, Feb 27 2008 5:23 PM | Permanent Link |
Oliver Bock | Tim Young [Elevate Software] wrote:
> Are you sure that you weren't accidentally using a STD version server (or > one that was compiled with the STD version) ? Well, I have done that once before ![]() on different operating systems were all done using the same binary. Note that I am not using the server you distribute, but have created my own binary. Perhaps something about how I am configuring the server is affecting it. The only thing I could think of was the temporary directory, which I am configuring to a subdirectory of the main Windows temp directory. I have verified that the .scf file was created, and my log file is working so I guess that is OK. This is not a big deal for me since I have already added the code to manually reconfigure max_connections, and it works fine. Oliver |
Thu, Feb 28 2008 6:41 AM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Oliver,
<< Well, I have done that once before ![]() on different operating systems were all done using the same binary. Note that I am not using the server you distribute, but have created my own binary. >> Are you re-compiling the DBISAM source code, or using the DCUs ? I just find it rather odd that it is reverting to the magic "5-connection" point that is the same as with the TRIAL and STD versions. If it was a random issue, I would expect it to revert to something different. Also, these session limits are IFDEF'd in the code, so it's not code that would even exist in a non-STD version. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Thu, Feb 28 2008 8:57 PM | Permanent Link |
Oliver Bock | Tim Young [Elevate Software] wrote:
> Are you re-compiling the DBISAM source code, or using the DCUs ? I am using the DCUs. > I just > find it rather odd that it is reverting to the magic "5-connection" point > that is the same as with the TRIAL and STD versions. If it was a random > issue, I would expect it to revert to something different. Also, these > session limits are IFDEF'd in the code, so it's not code that would even > exist in a non-STD version. I agree. I found it so odd that I had trouble believing my customer at all at first! Oliver |
This web page was last updated on Wednesday, August 14, 2024 at 03:12 PM | Privacy Policy![]() © 2024 Elevate Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved Questions or comments ? ![]() |