![]() | ![]() Products ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Technical Support » DBISAM Technical Support » Support Forums » DBISAM General » View Thread |
Messages 11 to 17 of 17 total |
![]() |
Sat, Oct 20 2007 9:56 AM | Permanent Link |
Jose Eduardo Helminsky | Paul,
<< with DmL.TblLeden do begin if overname=true then edit else Append; fieldbyname('Naam').asstring:=EdtNaam.text+' '+Edtvoornaam.text; fieldbyname('Straat').asstring:=Edtadres.text+' '+EdtHuisnummer.text; fieldbyname('Postcode').asstring:=EdtPostcode.text; fieldbyname('plaats').asstring:=EdtPlaats.text; fieldbyname('geboortedatum').asdatetime:=strtodate(mskgeboorte.text); fieldbyname('actief').asstring:='A'; fieldbyname('A_S').asboolean:=true; //// default actieve speler if (bondslid.ItemIndex=0) then begin fieldbyname('aansluitdatum').asdatetime:=date; fieldbyname('status').asstring:=''; end; if (overname=true) and (bondslid.ItemIndex=1) then fieldbyname('aansluitdatum').clear; positie:=Getbookmark; post; gotobookmark(positie); freebookmark(positie); end; >> Why should you use BookMark functions inside your code ? It does nothing in your code and I think it must be a problem. Just comment out the lines with BookMark functions and see if the errors still happens. Eduardo |
Sun, Oct 21 2007 6:37 AM | Permanent Link |
Paul Waegemans | Jose Eduardo Helminsky <eduardo@hpro.com.br> wrote:
Paul, << with DmL.TblLeden do begin if overname=true then edit else Append; fieldbyname('Naam').asstring:=EdtNaam.text+' '+Edtvoornaam.text; Why should you use BookMark functions inside your code ? It does nothing in your code and I think it must be a problem. Just comment out the lines with BookMark functions and see if the errors still happens. Eduardo I receive the errorcode "Table not in edit or insert mode" just after the append line... The code worked correctly for years... and still works correct on my table. + I have the problem with a customers table even after I did a repair with forceindexrebuild (to be sure table and indexes are OK) Paul. |
Mon, Oct 22 2007 2:10 PM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Paul,
Sorry for not being more clear - I really need the code *in context*, i.e. a project that demonstrates the issue. The issue is most likely related to a lookup field, etc., and a code snippet doesn't give me that information. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Wed, Nov 7 2007 9:04 AM | Permanent Link |
Paul Waegemans | "Tim Young [Elevate Software]" <timyoung@elevatesoft.com> wrote:
Paul, Sorry for not being more clear - I really need the code *in context*, i.e. a project that demonstrates the issue. The issue is most likely related to a lookup field, etc., and a code snippet doesn't give me that information. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com The problem continues and only with the dataset of 1 customer. I repaired the table, rebuild the indexes... Can it have something to do with a master-detail relationship with other tables (The "problem" table=master) Paul. |
Wed, Nov 7 2007 1:38 PM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Paul,
<< Can it have something to do with a master-detail relationship with other tables (The "problem" table=master) >> Sure. If anything causes the master record to move, it will force a refresh of the detail table's linkage and cause the detail table to revert to browse mode. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Thu, Nov 8 2007 5:18 AM | Permanent Link |
paul waegemans | "Tim Young [Elevate Software]" <timyoung@elevatesoft.com> wrote:
Paul, << Can it have something to do with a master-detail relationship with other tables (The "problem" table=master) >> Sure. If anything causes the master record to move, it will force a refresh of the detail table's linkage and cause the detail table to revert to browse mode. -- Tim, OK. The detail table had a record where tha value for the "masterfield" was NULL. When I remove this record from the detail table the problem is solved. Now I'am just wondering how this record got in the detail table??? But that is another problem. Paul |
Fri, Nov 9 2007 1:03 PM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Paul,
<< OK. The detail table had a record where tha value for the "masterfield" was NULL. When I remove this record from the detail table the problem is solved. Now I'am just wondering how this record got in the detail table??? But that is another problem. >> Hmm, a NULL master column in the detail table, by itself, will not cause the problem that you mentioned, even with a master-detail link established. It would simply be excluded from visibility when the master-detail link was established/refreshed. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
« Previous Page | Page 2 of 2 | |
Jump to Page: 1 2 |
This web page was last updated on Wednesday, August 14, 2024 at 03:12 PM | Privacy Policy![]() © 2024 Elevate Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved Questions or comments ? ![]() |