![]() | ![]() Products ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Technical Support » DBISAM Technical Support » Support Forums » DBISAM Enhancement Requests and Suggestions » View Thread |
Messages 1 to 3 of 3 total |
![]() |
Tue, Oct 24 2006 12:06 PM | Permanent Link |
Heiko Knuettel | In some future release
![]() I think with ADO.NET these GUIDs are getting more and more important, and storing them as binaries would make everything a bit smaller and faster. Cheers Heiko |
Tue, Oct 24 2006 4:13 PM | Permanent Link |
"Ralf Mimoun" | Heiko Knuettel wrote:
> In some future release ![]() > > I think with ADO.NET these GUIDs are getting more and more important, > and storing them as binaries would make everything a bit smaller and > faster. I use then extensively in a huge system, running 24/7 on 6 sites. I had never any speed problems with the current GUID implementation. Really, never. And that system use GUIDs as IDs everywhere, with quite some complex, multiple JOINs. Ralf |
Tue, Oct 24 2006 5:01 PM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Heiko,
<< I think with ADO.NET these GUIDs are getting more and more important, and storing them as binaries would make everything a bit smaller and faster. >> We might be able to offer an alternative binary version of the GUID field. However, there's nothing stopping you from using a ftBytes field now for storing binary GUIDs. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
This web page was last updated on Monday, July 15, 2024 at 07:03 PM | Privacy Policy![]() © 2024 Elevate Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved Questions or comments ? ![]() |