![]() | ![]() Products ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Technical Support » ElevateDB Technical Support » Support Forums » ElevateDB General » View Thread |
Messages 1 to 8 of 8 total |
![]() |
Mon, Jun 7 2010 4:53 PM | Permanent Link |
Michael Fullerton | I converted a DBISAM3/ASTA program to use EDB 2 C/S. One customer is
saying the new version is much slower than the old version for the remote client. They use a T1 to access the main site. Queries are pretty well index optimized and sensitive. Anything else I might not have thought of? I don't use RemoteCompression. Would that help much? |
Mon, Jun 7 2010 5:10 PM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Michael,
<< I converted a DBISAM3/ASTA program to use EDB 2 C/S. One customer is saying the new version is much slower than the old version for the remote client. They use a T1 to access the main site. Queries are pretty well index optimized and sensitive. Anything else I might not have thought of? I don't use RemoteCompression. Would that help much? >> Yes, that will help immensely over any type of connection that has less than 10Mb of bandwidth. Did they happen to indicate what portions of the application are slow ? The biggest slowdowns in Delphi applications over WANs are due to chattiness and latency, so you need to avoid things like lookup fields and calculated fields that cause further data access. Using cached updates helps in situations where you want to bring over a set of rows, edit them, and then send back the edits, such as in a master-detail situation. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Wed, Jun 23 2010 5:42 PM | Permanent Link |
Michael Fullerton | On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:10:30 -0400, "Tim Young [Elevate Software]"
<timyoung@elevatesoft.com> wrote: >Michael, > ><< I converted a DBISAM3/ASTA program to use EDB 2 C/S. One customer is >saying the new version is much slower than the old version for the >remote client. They use a T1 to access the main site. Queries are pretty >well index optimized and sensitive. Anything else I might not have thought >of? I don't use RemoteCompression. Would that help much? >> > >Yes, that will help immensely over any type of connection that has less than >10Mb of bandwidth. Did they happen to indicate what portions of the >application are slow ? The biggest slowdowns in Delphi applications over >WANs are due to chattiness and latency, so you need to avoid things like >lookup fields and calculated fields that cause further data access. > >Using cached updates helps in situations where you want to bring over a set >of rows, edit them, and then send back the edits, such as in a master-detail >situation. The customer claimed adjusting the compression level is of no help. What do you mean by lookup fields and calculated fields? Like a TDBLookupCombobox? I use many of those on one form but that is not the form they are complaining of. The app doesn't use any master-detail implementations. |
Wed, Jun 23 2010 6:35 PM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Michael,
<< The customer claimed adjusting the compression level is of no help. What do you mean by lookup fields and calculated fields? Like a TDBLookupCombobox? I use many of those on one form but that is not the form they are complaining of. The app doesn't use any master-detail implementations. >> Can you email me the code/form that they're complaining about ? That will help immensely, since I can tell you exactly what to optimize. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Thu, Jun 24 2010 2:55 AM | Permanent Link |
Roy Lambert NLH Associates ![]() | Michael
Probably nothing to do with it but since file extensions have changes is there an AV that was ignoring .dat etc and isn't ignoring the new extensions? Roy Lambert |
Tue, Jul 6 2010 7:17 PM | Permanent Link |
Michael Fullerton | On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:35:33 -0400, "Tim Young [Elevate Software]"
<timyoung@elevatesoft.com> wrote: >Michael, > ><< The customer claimed adjusting the compression level is of no help. What >do you mean by lookup fields and calculated fields? Like a >TDBLookupCombobox? I use many of those on one form but that is not the form >they are complaining of. The app doesn't use any master-detail >implementations. >> > >Can you email me the code/form that they're complaining about ? That will >help immensely, since I can tell you exactly what to optimize. Just heard back from the customer today. They said the compression actually does help but they had to reboot the server. Also they have to reboot the server every day or it slows down again. Why would that be? |
Wed, Jul 7 2010 3:20 AM | Permanent Link |
Roy Lambert NLH Associates ![]() | Michael
It sounds as though you have a similar situation to myself. The main difference is that I'm using file server mode on my small network: 2 Vista, 1 XP client and 1 XP as server. My app runs fine most of the time, but on occasions moving between records is a bit molasses like. Sometimes reboot the client fixes it, sometimes reboot the server does and sometimes it takes shut down everything. I've tried various things without a cure and I'm beginning to wonder if its my 6 year old Netgear router just getting tiered. I may try giving it a holiday soon. Roy Lambert |
Wed, Jul 7 2010 1:00 PM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Michael,
<< Just heard back from the customer today. They said the compression actually does help but they had to reboot the server. Also they have to reboot the server every day or it slows down again. Why would that be? >> Reboot the entire server machine ? I have no idea. Did someone actually analyse the machine to see what the status of the memory, CPU, disk, etc. was ? -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
This web page was last updated on Wednesday, August 14, 2024 at 03:12 PM | Privacy Policy![]() © 2024 Elevate Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved Questions or comments ? ![]() |