![]() | ![]() Products ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Technical Support » ElevateDB Technical Support » Support Forums » ElevateDB General » View Thread |
Messages 1 to 9 of 9 total |
![]() |
Thu, Nov 1 2007 6:41 AM | Permanent Link |
"Harry de Boer" | LS,
When writing joins where tables are involved that have the same fieldnames dbIsam 3.3 wrote it as: custID, custID_1. EDB however writes it as custID1. Is this standard SQL2003 or is there another reason for changing it? I was trying to switch from dbIsam3 to EDB queries that were source to FR reports, and I thought that was easy because only the querysource was different. Now it seems that the output changed too, so I have to change all my reports that uses the 'old style' fieldnames. I have hundreds reports and a lot of customers, so.... Is there a way of easing the pain -of which I haven't thought of, or is it just the way it is? Regards, Harry |
Thu, Nov 1 2007 5:17 PM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Harry,
<< When writing joins where tables are involved that have the same fieldnames dbIsam 3.3 wrote it as: custID, custID_1. EDB however writes it as custID1. Is this standard SQL2003 or is there another reason for changing it? >> I'm afraid that it was simply arbitrary, however I'm not sure if I should change it now because it may break new EDB applications. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Fri, Nov 2 2007 1:46 AM | Permanent Link |
Charles Tyson | Harry, wouldn't it be easier to edit your queries to e.g.
select a.custID as "custID", b.custID as "custID_1" Or else, let your text editor run a search and replace on your .fr3 files (aren't they some species of XML text?) Harry de Boer wrote: > LS, > > When writing joins where tables are involved that have the same fieldnames > dbIsam 3.3 wrote it as: custID, custID_1. > EDB however writes it as custID1. Is this standard SQL2003 or is there > another reason for changing it? > > I was trying to switch from dbIsam3 to EDB queries that were source to FR > reports, and I thought that was easy because only the querysource was > different. Now it seems that the output changed too, so I have to change all > my reports that uses the 'old style' fieldnames. I have hundreds reports and > a lot of customers, so.... > > Is there a way of easing the pain -of which I haven't thought of, or is it > just the way it is? |
Fri, Nov 2 2007 4:01 AM | Permanent Link |
"Harry de Boer" | Tim,
I don't know if there are already a lot of new apps with EDB 'live'. Could you hold a poll for this on your site or mail EDB owners if this would affect them. I understand I'm asking a lot of you here, but as you can see, it would be great for us to port apps with a little more ease. I don't know how this was handled in dbIsam4, maybe more users have the same problems? Regards, Harry "Tim Young [Elevate Software]" <timyoung@elevatesoft.com> schreef in bericht news:471CE658-1EDB-450E-B554-A924B74821BE@news.elevatesoft.com... > Harry, > > << When writing joins where tables are involved that have the same > fieldnames dbIsam 3.3 wrote it as: custID, custID_1. EDB however writes it > as custID1. Is this standard SQL2003 or is there another reason for changing > it? >> > > I'm afraid that it was simply arbitrary, however I'm not sure if I should > change it now because it may break new EDB applications. > > -- > Tim Young > Elevate Software > www.elevatesoft.com > > |
Fri, Nov 2 2007 4:12 AM | Permanent Link |
"Harry de Boer" | Charles,
The problem is that we use a visual querybuilder which users also can build queries and the build reports. So it's automated. Replacing is also difficult because it's still FR2.4 -no xml- and the report is stored in a Blob field. Regards, Harry "Charles Tyson" <cmtNOSPAMzeebox@sbcglobal.net> schreef in bericht news:9A925802-1B03-4008-BC11-2C7C9E0752B0@news.elevatesoft.com... > Harry, wouldn't it be easier to edit your queries to e.g. > > select a.custID as "custID", b.custID as "custID_1" > > Or else, let your text editor run a search and replace on your .fr3 > files (aren't they some species of XML text?) > > > > Harry de Boer wrote: > > LS, > > > > When writing joins where tables are involved that have the same fieldnames > > dbIsam 3.3 wrote it as: custID, custID_1. > > EDB however writes it as custID1. Is this standard SQL2003 or is there > > another reason for changing it? > > > > I was trying to switch from dbIsam3 to EDB queries that were source to FR > > reports, and I thought that was easy because only the querysource was > > different. Now it seems that the output changed too, so I have to change all > > my reports that uses the 'old style' fieldnames. I have hundreds reports and > > a lot of customers, so.... > > > > Is there a way of easing the pain -of which I haven't thought of, or is it > > just the way it is? |
Sat, Nov 3 2007 6:23 PM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Harry,
<< I don't know if there are already a lot of new apps with EDB 'live'. Could you hold a poll for this on your site or mail EDB owners if this would affect them. I understand I'm asking a lot of you here, but as you can see, it would be great for us to port apps with a little more ease. I don't know how this was handled in dbIsam4, maybe more users have the same problems? >> I'll have to see about doing this after 1.06 is out. It's something that doesn't require a lot of work, but I still have to be careful about such a change. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Fri, Nov 9 2007 4:50 PM | Permanent Link |
"John Seward" | > The problem is that we use a visual querybuilder
Which one, if I may ask? And how do you like it? Thanks |
Sat, Nov 10 2007 3:09 AM | Permanent Link |
"Harry de Boer" | John,
VQB from ModeSoft, but it's just for dbIsam 3x, so we have to make another choice when migrating to EDB. It was in our opinion the best querybuilder there was -not well known to our suprise-, very flexible. Regards, Harry "John Seward" <no@spam.com> schreef in bericht news:xn0fdhw2qc3rj3000@news.elevatesoft.com... > > The problem is that we use a visual querybuilder > > Which one, if I may ask? And how do you like it? > > Thanks |
Sun, Nov 11 2007 10:29 PM | Permanent Link |
"John Seward" | Harry,
> -not well known to our suprise- Not too well known to Google either! I can't seem to find it. > so we have to make another choice when migrating to EDB I think there will be a number of us doing that... Thanks again. |
This web page was last updated on Wednesday, August 14, 2024 at 03:12 PM | Privacy Policy![]() © 2024 Elevate Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved Questions or comments ? ![]() |