![]() | ![]() Products ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Technical Support » ElevateDB Technical Support » Support Forums » ElevateDB General » View Thread |
Messages 1 to 10 of 10 total |
![]() |
Wed, Sep 17 2008 10:47 AM | Permanent Link |
Roy Lambert NLH Associates ![]() | Table Calls is set up as a detail of the table project: MasterFields = '_CallID' MasterSource = dsProject TableName = 'Calls' After this while (not Project.Eof) and (Project.FieldByName('_CallID').AsInteger <> LoadToCall) do Project.Next; Calls is not on the right record - Roy Lambert |
Thu, Sep 18 2008 5:50 AM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Roy,
<< After this while (not Project.Eof) and (Project.FieldByName('_CallID').AsInteger <> LoadToCall) do Project.Next; Calls is not on the right record - >> Could you send me the table in question ? (catalog also, please). -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Thu, Sep 18 2008 6:38 AM | Permanent Link |
Roy Lambert NLH Associates ![]() | Tim
> while (not Project.Eof) and (Project.FieldByName('_CallID').AsInteger <> >LoadToCall) do Project.Next; > > Calls is not on the right record - >> > >Could you send me the table in question ? (catalog also, please). Unfortunately no, or at least partly no. Of the two tables one (the master) is in-memory created from lots of other tables. I've solved it for now by getting rid of the master-detail and just doing a .FindKey when the master table is scrolled (actually of an OnChange in a dbedit). It was the move to that approach which led to the question about disablecontrols. Thinking about it the problem is the same one just that I hadn't spotted it before. Roy Lambert |
Thu, Sep 18 2008 7:35 AM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Roy,
<< Unfortunately no, or at least partly no. Of the two tables one (the master) is in-memory created from lots of other tables. I've solved it for now by getting rid of the master-detail and just doing a .FindKey when the master table is scrolled (actually of an OnChange in a dbedit). It was the move to that approach which led to the question about disablecontrols. Thinking about it the problem is the same one just that I hadn't spotted it before. >> So you're saying that the problem is that DisableControls is in effect ? -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Thu, Sep 18 2008 8:28 AM | Permanent Link |
Roy Lambert NLH Associates ![]() | Tim
>So you're saying that the problem is that DisableControls is in effect ? Not precisely. I was saying that adding in a table.enablecontrols fixed it <vbg>. But I've just done a bit of research (miracle notification D2006 help worked!) and stuffed in the following line if project.ControlsDisabled then showmessage('boing'); and I get boing. I scanned the entire project for disablecontrols and I've found the culprit - see below my sig. The behaviour must have changed recently, or its my subclassing EDBTable that's done it, or I've changed the code and only just noticed. Pick which one you like. Roy Lambert procedure ZapInMemoryTable(WhichTable: TnlhTable; ZapComponent: boolean = True); var Zapper: TEDBQuery; begin Zapper := TEDBQuery.Create(nil); try try if Assigned(WhichTable) and DoesTableExist(WhichTable) then begin WhichTable.DisableControls; <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< WhichTable.Close; WhichTable.Exclusive := True; Zapper.SessionName := WhichTable.SessionName; Zapper.DatabaseName := WhichTable.DatabaseName; Zapper.SQL.Text := 'DROP TABLE ' + WhichTable.TableName; Zapper.ExecSQL; Zapper.Close; if ZapComponent then FreeAndNil(WhichTable); end; except // MessageDlg('Problem experienced deleteing memory table: ' + #13 + WhichTable.Name + #13 + WhichTable.TableName, mtError, [mbOK], 0); end; finally Zapper.Free; end; end; |
Thu, Sep 18 2008 9:29 AM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Roy,
<< The behaviour must have changed recently, or its my subclassing EDBTable that's done it, or I've changed the code and only just noticed. Pick which one you like. >> I'm going to have to go with the latter. ![]() -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Thu, Sep 18 2008 10:12 AM | Permanent Link |
Roy Lambert NLH Associates ![]() | Tim
><< The behaviour must have changed recently, or its my subclassing EDBTable >that's done it, or I've changed the code and only just noticed. Pick which >one you like. >> > >I'm going to have to go with the latter. ![]() So would I but your saying it made me think and check a version of the unit that procedure is in - file dated 14/04/2008 and the code is the same. I think I would have noticed sometime in the last 5 months ![]() Its also very similar to the version I had for DBISAM which has been used for many years. Roy Lambert |
Thu, Sep 18 2008 10:42 AM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Roy,
<< So would I but your saying it made me think and check a version of the unit that procedure is in - file dated 14/04/2008 and the code is the same. I think I would have noticed sometime in the last 5 months ![]() Its also very similar to the version I had for DBISAM which has been used for many years. >> I don't what to tell you - if removing the DisableControls fixes the problem, then it is most likely caused by the fact that the DisableControls is disabling the master-detail link. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Thu, Sep 18 2008 11:27 AM | Permanent Link |
Roy Lambert NLH Associates ![]() | Tim
I'm always happy to fix a bug but I hate it when I don't know why it was there in the first place. Ah well, that's life. Roy Lambert |
Fri, Sep 19 2008 2:53 AM | Permanent Link |
"Iztok Lajovic" | Roy,
from Delphi help on 'DisableControls method (TDataSet)': ::: If the dataset is the master of a master/detail relationship, calling DisableControls also disables the master/detail relationship. Setting BlockReadSize instead of calling DisableControls updates the detail datasets as you scroll through the dataset, but does not update data-aware controls. ::: HTH Iztok Lajovic "Roy Lambert" <roy.lambert@skynet.co.uk> je napisal v sporočilo news:19AE2204-1443-4D5D-A1DC-3701F390CDD6@news.elevatesoft.com ... > Tim > > >> while (not Project.Eof) and (Project.FieldByName('_CallID').AsInteger <> >>LoadToCall) do Project.Next; >> >> Calls is not on the right record - >> >> >>Could you send me the table in question ? (catalog also, please). > > Unfortunately no, or at least partly no. Of the two tables one (the > master) is in-memory created from lots of other tables. I've solved it for > now by getting rid of the master-detail and just doing a .FindKey when the > master table is scrolled (actually of an OnChange in a dbedit). It was the > move to that approach which led to the question about disablecontrols. > Thinking about it the problem is the same one just that I hadn't spotted > it before. > > Roy Lambert |
This web page was last updated on Wednesday, August 14, 2024 at 07:31 PM | Privacy Policy![]() © 2024 Elevate Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved Questions or comments ? ![]() |