![]() | ![]() Products ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Technical Support » ElevateDB Technical Support » Support Forums » ElevateDB SQL » View Thread |
Messages 1 to 4 of 4 total |
![]() |
Sun, Apr 12 2009 2:15 AM | Permanent Link |
Jeff Dunlop | If I edit the same field in the same record at the same time on databases remote to each
other, I wind up with a condition where the records cross stream, and each database has what was entered on the other side, but they do not agree. If I edit two different fields on the two copies, the result is comical, with exactly 1/4 of the changed information going anywhere. Whether I pull and then push, or push and then pull, the results are identical. Comments appreciated. |
Sun, Apr 12 2009 3:58 AM | Permanent Link |
Jeff Dunlop | I have a reasonable workaround, where I have triggers stamping records so that I know
which updates should be rejected. However, it looks like if I reject a row from an update, then the entire update bombs out. Is it possible to reject selected rows from an update without a tedious column by column unwind of the changes in a before update trigger? |
Mon, Apr 13 2009 1:39 AM | Permanent Link |
Jeff Dunlop | Ignore the first two posts, I've moved past them.
However, the absolute simplest case of replication is falling over and I'm baffled as to why. A single published table on two database servers. I edit one single record on the 1st computer and do no more editing of any kind. When I save updates, I see in the uncompressed change log that publish ID {5B...} has seen the record. I load the update into the 2nd computer and save updates, I see in the uncompressed change log that publish IDs {5B...} and {0F...} have seen the record. I load this update into the 1st computer and save updates, oops, I see in the uncompressed change log that only publish ID {5B...} has seen the record. When I load this update into the 2nd computer, I'm not shocked to see an exception talking about a primary key violation. I can't come up with a simpler replication scenario to try to troubleshoot why this isn't working. 2.02B10. |
Mon, Apr 13 2009 2:45 AM | Permanent Link |
Jeff Dunlop | Well I created an empty error insert trigger and it seems to be swallowing the exception.
Still have no idea why the manifests aren't identical going both directions on an unchanging table. |
This web page was last updated on Wednesday, August 14, 2024 at 07:31 PM | Privacy Policy![]() © 2024 Elevate Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved Questions or comments ? ![]() |