![]() | ![]() Products ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Technical Support » ElevateDB Technical Support » Support Forums » ElevateDB SQL » View Thread |
Messages 1 to 9 of 9 total |
![]() |
Thu, Jun 18 2009 10:51 AM | Permanent Link |
Tiago Ameller | This query runs with no error, but ORDER BY is ignored
SELECT Remesa, C.Entidad, C.Oficina, Serie, Factura, 0 AS ExpFac, CodigoLog, Asunto, FacturarA AS Cliente, FechaFactura AS Fecha, C.DC, C.Cuenta FROM MAEXPEDI INNER JOIN MACLIENT C ON (FACTURARA = C.NIF) WHERE REMESA > 0 AND SERIE > 0 AND DOMICILIAR = TRUE ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 --ORDER BY Remesa, Entidad, Oficina, Serie, Factura Commented line is the correct one to make ORDER BY run. Does EDB support ordinal numbers in ORDER BY as many RDBMS do? If not, I'll make this request, please. |
Thu, Jun 18 2009 11:55 AM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Tiago,
<< Does EDB support ordinal numbers in ORDER BY as many RDBMS do? If not, I'll make this request, please. >> No, it doesn't because the SQL standards folks have indicated that they will be phasing out support for such a construct. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Thu, Jun 18 2009 12:08 PM | Permanent Link |
Tiago Ameller | Tim,
<No, it doesn't because the SQL standards folks have indicated that they will be phasing out support for such a construct.> It's a handful feature when building SQL in code ... In such case EDB would raise an error to inform that construct is not supported, I think. |
Thu, Jun 18 2009 7:33 PM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Tiago,
<< In such case EDB would raise an error to inform that construct is not supported, I think. >> It is supported - any constant integer value is a valid expression. Remember, in EDB the ORDER BY clause can use *any* valid expression, including referencing columns that aren't in the SELECT list. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Fri, Jun 19 2009 1:51 AM | Permanent Link |
"Thorsten Engler" | Tim Young [Elevate Software] wrote:
> It is supported - any constant integer value is a valid expression. > Remember, in EDB the ORDER BY clause can use any valid expression, > including referencing columns that aren't in the SELECT list. For what it's worth, I'm with Tim and the SQL standard on this one. |
Fri, Jun 19 2009 3:36 AM | Permanent Link |
Tiago Ameller | Tim,
<It is supported - any constant integer value is a valid expression. Remember, in EDB the ORDER BY clause can use *any* valid expression, including referencing columns that aren't in the SELECT list.> Yes, right. But ORDER BY 1, 2, 3 has no sense, despite it's a "valid expression". This makes a waste of time for every EDB new user looking for this issue: You create a query. It runs ok, you don't see at first (or second) test ORDER BY is incorrect and you have a bug. Almost every EDB user will sufer this error maker. This construct is wide used in all major RDBMS and, of course, DBISAM. Documentation informs of it in DBISAM Migration chapter. IMHO in SELECT chapter would be a warning or similar to avoid this kind of problems. I apreciate so much you can ORDER BY columns that aren't in the SELECT list, this a good feature ![]() |
Fri, Jun 19 2009 4:00 AM | Permanent Link |
"Ole Willy Tuv" | >> It is supported - any constant integer value is a valid expression.
>> Remember, in EDB the ORDER BY clause can use any valid expression, >> including referencing columns that aren't in the SELECT list. > > For what it's worth, I'm with Tim and the SQL standard on this one. +1 ![]() Ole Willy Tuv |
Fri, Jun 19 2009 3:07 PM | Permanent Link |
"Jeff Cook" | Tiago Ameller wrote:
<snip> > Yes, right. But ORDER BY 1, 2, 3 has no sense, despite it's a "valid > expression". This makes a waste of time for every EDB new user ... <snip> Kia Orana Tiago Forgive a mere DBISAM v3.30 user giving his 2c worth ... but this is a great feature if I understand it correctly and it gives me an extra impetus to move to EDB, eventually ![]() If you can use an "valid expression" then you can do cool stuff like:- ORDER BY CustomerCode, IF(TransType = "Invoice" THEN 1 ELSE IF("TransType" = Receipt THEN 2 ELSE 9)) /*EDB syntax is probably different!*/, TransDate Kia Manuia Jeff -- Jeff Cook Aspect Systems Ltd www.aspect.co.nz + Joan and Jeff Cook The Cooks Oasis www.cookislandsoasis.com |
Mon, Jun 22 2009 1:43 PM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Tiago,
<< Yes, right. But ORDER BY 1, 2, 3 has no sense, despite it's a "valid expression". >> Well, so does True=False, yet customers use such a construct in WHERE clauses. IOW, there really is no way for us to *really* tell whether the expressions are nonsense. The only judgement that can be made is whether they are valid or not. << This makes a waste of time for every EDB new user looking for this issue: You create a query. It runs ok, you don't see at first (or second) test ORDER BY is incorrect and you have a bug. Almost every EDB user will sufer this error maker. This construct is wide used in all major RDBMS and, of course, DBISAM. Documentation informs of it in DBISAM Migration chapter. IMHO in SELECT chapter would be a warning or similar to avoid this kind of problems. >> Yes, but the migration section is specifically written for DBISAM users, whereas the SELECT is not. Duplicating the migration information everywhere else in the manual really defeats the purpose of having the migration section in the first place. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
This web page was last updated on Wednesday, August 14, 2024 at 07:31 PM | Privacy Policy![]() © 2024 Elevate Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved Questions or comments ? ![]() |