![]() | ![]() Products ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Technical Support » ElevateDB Technical Support » Support Forums » ElevateDB SQL » View Thread |
Messages 1 to 6 of 6 total |
![]() |
Wed, May 23 2007 5:12 AM | Permanent Link |
"Harry de Boer" | Tim,
Is cascading update / delete something we can see soon (as restrict is the only choice now)? RESTRICT will do in a lot of 1:n situations I have in an old dbIsam project that I am doing from scratch now in EDB, but for n:n relations the CASCADE option is most needed there. Regards, Harry |
Wed, May 23 2007 3:00 PM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Harry,
<< Is cascading update / delete something we can see soon (as restrict is the only choice now)? >> Probably not until the enterprise server version is done. The issue is an architectural one with respect to how the transaction locking works currently. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Thu, May 24 2007 5:13 AM | Permanent Link |
"Harry de Boer" | Tim,
-What exactly is the "enterprise server version"? -Is (full) RI only in that or also in EDB standard? I know you are very busy with EDB development (1.03 o the way) and updating the docs. However, is it possible to give an estimated timeline on when certain things are 'planned' to come, such as RI, SQL scripts, EDBman enhancements, etc or is this just to difficult to say? Regards, Harry "Tim Young [Elevate Software]" <timyoung@elevatesoft.com> schreef in bericht news:668CFB8A-5A76-4364-83F5-956F9981DE13@news.elevatesoft.com... > Harry, > > << Is cascading update / delete something we can see soon (as restrict is > the only choice now)? >> > > Probably not until the enterprise server version is done. The issue is an > architectural one with respect to how the transaction locking works > currently. > > -- > Tim Young > Elevate Software > www.elevatesoft.com > > |
Thu, May 24 2007 7:36 AM | Permanent Link |
Roy Lambert NLH Associates ![]() | Harry
>-What exactly is the "enterprise server version"? >-Is (full) RI only in that or also in EDB standard? I think this is going to be the c/s only version so that locking tables during a cascade is easier than in a mixed f/s c/s environment. Roy Lambert |
Sat, May 26 2007 5:55 PM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Harry,
<< -What exactly is the "enterprise server version"? >> Sorry, it's our higher-end server version that I'll be working on later this year. It will be like EDB now, but won't do file-sharing, will have a single-file database, etc. << -Is (full) RI only in that or also in EDB standard? >> RI is present in EDB now, only without cascading support, only restrict. << I know you are very busy with EDB development (1.03 o the way) and updating the docs. However, is it possible to give an estimated timeline on when certain things are 'planned' to come, such as RI, SQL scripts, EDBman enhancements, etc or is this just to difficult to say? >> I'll see if I can get our Current Developments page updated for EDB shortly so that you can see what's coming. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
Sat, May 26 2007 5:56 PM | Permanent Link |
Tim Young [Elevate Software] Elevate Software, Inc. ![]() | Roy,
<< I think this is going to be the c/s only version so that locking tables during a cascade is easier than in a mixed f/s c/s environment. >> Correct. The good part is that it should be entirely identical to existing EDB remote sessions/client applications. Only the back-end will change. -- Tim Young Elevate Software www.elevatesoft.com |
This web page was last updated on Wednesday, August 14, 2024 at 07:31 PM | Privacy Policy![]() © 2024 Elevate Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved Questions or comments ? ![]() |