![]() | ![]() Products ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Technical Support » ElevateDB Technical Support » Support Forums » ElevateDB SQL » View Thread |
Messages 1 to 4 of 4 total |
![]() |
Mon, Jul 18 2011 6:12 PM | Permanent Link |
Dale Derix | Which method of retrieving the Case Name is faster (using a large dataset). I'm using this query to populate a grid which at most will retrieve about 40 rows at a time. It seems to me that the first query will only bother to retrieve _CaseName as it is needed by the grid. The second one however would have to process the entire query in order to satisfy the second join condition. Is that how it really works or is this pure nonsense on my part.
SELECT li.liDate, it.itItemName, (SELECT ca.caCaseName FROM Cases ca WHERE li.liCaseKey = ca.caCaseKey) AS _CaseName FROM LineItems li LEFT OUTER JOIN Items it ON li.liItemKey = it.itItemKey SELECT li.liDate, it.itItemName, ca.caCaseName AS _CaseName FROM LineItems li LEFT OUTER JOIN Items it ON li.liItemKey = it.itItemKey LEFT OUTER JOIN Cases ca on li.liCaseKey = ca.caCaseKey Dale |
Tue, Jul 19 2011 3:09 AM | Permanent Link |
Roy Lambert NLH Associates ![]() | Dale
I have no idea as to the answer to your question but I suspect the latter will be faster. Why not do the obvious and test them both in EDBManager? Roy Lambert |
Tue, Jul 19 2011 6:42 AM | Permanent Link |
John Hay | Dale
> Which method of retrieving the Case Name is faster (using a large dataset). I'm using this query to populate a grid which at most will retrieve about 40 rows at a time. It seems to me that the first query will only bother to retrieve _CaseName as it is needed by the grid. The second one however would have to process the entire query in order to satisfy the second join condition. Is that how it really works or is this pure nonsense on my part. > > SELECT > li.liDate, > it.itItemName, > (SELECT ca.caCaseName FROM Cases ca WHERE li.liCaseKey = ca.caCaseKey) AS _CaseName > FROM LineItems li > LEFT OUTER JOIN Items it ON li.liItemKey = it.itItemKey > > > SELECT > li.liDate, > it.itItemName, > ca.caCaseName AS _CaseName > FROM LineItems li > LEFT OUTER JOIN Items it ON li.liItemKey = it.itItemKey > LEFT OUTER JOIN Cases ca on li.liCaseKey = ca.caCaseKey As neither query can return a sensitive result set I would suspect the correlated subquery might even be slower than the join. With a large dataset if you can make the query sensitive you will get the best speed. For example the following with request sensitive result set. SELECT li.liDate, (SELECT it.itItemName FROM Items it WHERE li.liItemKey = it.itItemKey) AS itItemName, (SELECT ca.caCaseName FROM Cases ca WHERE li.liCaseKey = ca.caCaseKey) AS _CaseName FROM LineItems li John |
Tue, Jul 19 2011 12:20 PM | Permanent Link |
Dale Derix | The results are in (using dataset of 50,000 records):
The first one is the slowest at 11.7 seconds. The second one is next at 8.6 seconds John... yours was the winner hands down at 0 seconds... Very Cool. Dale |
This web page was last updated on Wednesday, August 14, 2024 at 03:12 PM | Privacy Policy![]() © 2024 Elevate Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved Questions or comments ? ![]() |